Mike_Aurelius
08-21-2008, 07:01 AM
From Dennis Brady. I'm wondering why he didn't post it here... He has threads on LE, WC and GL:
http://www.glassline.net/forums/showthread.php?t=6267
http://www.wetcanvas.com/forums/showthread.php?t=513692
http://www.lampworketc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=101466
I'm compiling an article on the advantages and disadvantages of different glass and would appreciate any comments or suggestions:
One of the most difficult decisions glass workers must make is deciding what kind of glass to use. You can’t mix non-compatible glass and few can afford to keep a stock of more then one kind. Some artisans will alternate their work with different makes of glass but most prefer to chose just one and use it exclusively. Whether you are blowing, casting, flameworking, or fusing - there are advantages and disadvantages to different makes of glass. Those that are involved only with flameworking are likely to chose a different glass then those involved only with kilnforming, and those that alternate working in various ways might make an entirely different choice.
COE 33 (Borosilicate) advantages
Silver glass look at cheap prices
More forgiving of temperature variances during working than soft glass
Allows complex constructions through the joining of separate components.
Using clear base for canes makes color go a long way
Clear rod and tubing available in a wide size range allows for blowing with a torch
Colored boro rods are US made
Exceptional clarity
Clear glass very low cost
Very good for organic flowing shapes
Finished object can be safely used in high heat applications.
COE 33 (Borosilicate) disadvantages
Limited availability of easily worked primary and pastel colors
Limited availability of sheet material
Higher temperature requirements to work requires a larger torch and oxygen supply
More susceptible to devitrification than soft glass.
Not as good as soft glass for fine detail and definition.
COE 90 advantages
Reliable COE consistency
Extensive color selection
Available in sheet, frit, or rod
Extensive technical support
Equally suitable for both torching & kilnforming
Made in the USA
COE 90 disadvantages
Sheet glass more expensive
Sheet glass more difficult to cut
Sheet glass textured and more likely to entrap air
Higher temperature required to melt
COE 96 advantages
Sheet glass less expensive
Sheet glass easy to cut
Sheet glass smooth and less likely to entrap air
Equally suitable for both torching & kilnforming
Available in sheet, frit, or rod
Made in the USA
COE 96 disadvantages
Less color variety then 90 or 104
COE 104 advantages
Much more rod color selection then any other soft glass.
Slightly lower melting temperature than 90 or 96
Rods less expensive then 90 or 96
COE 104 disadvantages
Unreliable compatibility consistency
Extremely limited availability of sheet material
High likelihood of devit when fused
Imported - price likely to steadily increase
COE 120 (Satake) Advantages
Melts at very low temperature and can be worked without oxygen. Great for Hot Head.
Holds heat – longer working time.
Available with or without lead content.
Lead content glass melts at low enough temperature no fumes are produced.
Has many colors unavailable in other glass.
COE 120 (Satake) Disadvantages
Melts very quickly and can be difficult to control with regular torches
Less color selection then other glass.
Imported – price likely to steadily increase.
COE 82 (Float) Advantages
Clear float is the least expensive glass
Armstrong and Youghiogheny have a variety of float fusible sheet glass and frit
COE 82 (Float) Disadvantages
Not as compatibility reliable as COE 90 or 96
Clear float is more susceptible to devitrification then 90 or 96.
Requires higher heat to melt.
__________________
http://www.glassline.net/forums/showthread.php?t=6267
http://www.wetcanvas.com/forums/showthread.php?t=513692
http://www.lampworketc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=101466
I'm compiling an article on the advantages and disadvantages of different glass and would appreciate any comments or suggestions:
One of the most difficult decisions glass workers must make is deciding what kind of glass to use. You can’t mix non-compatible glass and few can afford to keep a stock of more then one kind. Some artisans will alternate their work with different makes of glass but most prefer to chose just one and use it exclusively. Whether you are blowing, casting, flameworking, or fusing - there are advantages and disadvantages to different makes of glass. Those that are involved only with flameworking are likely to chose a different glass then those involved only with kilnforming, and those that alternate working in various ways might make an entirely different choice.
COE 33 (Borosilicate) advantages
Silver glass look at cheap prices
More forgiving of temperature variances during working than soft glass
Allows complex constructions through the joining of separate components.
Using clear base for canes makes color go a long way
Clear rod and tubing available in a wide size range allows for blowing with a torch
Colored boro rods are US made
Exceptional clarity
Clear glass very low cost
Very good for organic flowing shapes
Finished object can be safely used in high heat applications.
COE 33 (Borosilicate) disadvantages
Limited availability of easily worked primary and pastel colors
Limited availability of sheet material
Higher temperature requirements to work requires a larger torch and oxygen supply
More susceptible to devitrification than soft glass.
Not as good as soft glass for fine detail and definition.
COE 90 advantages
Reliable COE consistency
Extensive color selection
Available in sheet, frit, or rod
Extensive technical support
Equally suitable for both torching & kilnforming
Made in the USA
COE 90 disadvantages
Sheet glass more expensive
Sheet glass more difficult to cut
Sheet glass textured and more likely to entrap air
Higher temperature required to melt
COE 96 advantages
Sheet glass less expensive
Sheet glass easy to cut
Sheet glass smooth and less likely to entrap air
Equally suitable for both torching & kilnforming
Available in sheet, frit, or rod
Made in the USA
COE 96 disadvantages
Less color variety then 90 or 104
COE 104 advantages
Much more rod color selection then any other soft glass.
Slightly lower melting temperature than 90 or 96
Rods less expensive then 90 or 96
COE 104 disadvantages
Unreliable compatibility consistency
Extremely limited availability of sheet material
High likelihood of devit when fused
Imported - price likely to steadily increase
COE 120 (Satake) Advantages
Melts at very low temperature and can be worked without oxygen. Great for Hot Head.
Holds heat – longer working time.
Available with or without lead content.
Lead content glass melts at low enough temperature no fumes are produced.
Has many colors unavailable in other glass.
COE 120 (Satake) Disadvantages
Melts very quickly and can be difficult to control with regular torches
Less color selection then other glass.
Imported – price likely to steadily increase.
COE 82 (Float) Advantages
Clear float is the least expensive glass
Armstrong and Youghiogheny have a variety of float fusible sheet glass and frit
COE 82 (Float) Disadvantages
Not as compatibility reliable as COE 90 or 96
Clear float is more susceptible to devitrification then 90 or 96.
Requires higher heat to melt.
__________________