The Melting Pot - Where All Glass Addicts Melt Together - Powered by vBulletin

Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast
Results 161 to 180 of 189

Thread: Bullseye pollution problems

  1. #161
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    da great white nort
    Posts
    456
    Rep Power
    21

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    locals are obviously looking for any opportunity to nit-pick
    the comments on the link are super reactionary, it's clear lots of those folks have no idea what they're talking about. not that any pollution is good, but calling on BE to shut down over this is a little bit hysterical. after 50 years, the fact that they didn't find a hundred tons of glass in this drain sort of implies that BE hasn't been intentionally dumping shit in the sewer system.

    i don't think people really have any concept of the pollution that industry, construction, even roads being used causes. selenium sounds scary enough to cause OUTRAGE! and no amount of education is going to stop the loudest yodelers from yodeling. this sounds to me like a case of virtue signalling, where the loudest is the right-est and everyone else hates the planet. heh.

  2. #162
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Boulder CO
    Posts
    1,422
    Rep Power
    25

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    Nimby....

  3. #163
    brads's Avatar
    brads is offline Intelligence has its limits. Stupidity is infinite. Higher Learning Member0-1 years in glass!1-6 years in glass!7-12 years in glass!13-18 years in glass!19-25 years in glass!25-49 years in glass!Ninja Badge
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Zombieland, Georgia
    Posts
    942
    Rep Power
    59

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    Quote Originally Posted by Yeef View Post
    the comments on the link are super reactionary, it's clear lots of those folks have no idea what they're talking about. not that any pollution is good, but calling on BE to shut down over this is a little bit hysterical. after 50 years, the fact that they didn't find a hundred tons of glass in this drain sort of implies that BE hasn't been intentionally dumping shit in the sewer system.

    i don't think people really have any concept of the pollution that industry, construction, even roads being used causes. selenium sounds scary enough to cause OUTRAGE! and no amount of education is going to stop the loudest yodelers from yodeling. this sounds to me like a case of virtue signalling, where the loudest is the right-est and everyone else hates the planet. heh.
    I hadn't read the comments section before, but when I did I found this one funny as hell (even though Bullseye legitimately deserves criticism for some of their practices) - "OMG they're going to hurt the endangered sewer salmon and brown trout!"

    But sadly, whether in national politics or something fairly localized like this, the level of ignorance and stupidity in the general population does nothing at all to help things. That ignorance and stupidity is well displayed in those comments.

  4. #164
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    From the DIRT!
    Posts
    5,504
    Rep Power
    70

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    So have the borosilicate color company's fired up cad production full speed or is there still shortage .

    I saw someone selling c red by momka for 60 a pound first


    That's reg price . I though well things of settled down .

    Figured I would ask the crowd
    Lampworking the road that never ends, Until your out of gas!

  5. #165
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eugene
    Posts
    38,871
    Rep Power
    221

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    I haven't seen anyone resume production yet.
    ~Misha

  6. #166
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    333
    Rep Power
    34

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    Quote Originally Posted by jr23 View Post
    So have the borosilicate color company's fired up cad production full speed or is there still shortage .

    I saw someone selling c red by momka for 60 a pound first


    That's reg price . I though well things of settled down .

    Figured I would ask the crowd
    Momka is the only company that hasn't stopped cad color production so far.

  7. #167
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Roanoke, VA
    Posts
    2,133
    Rep Power
    38

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    From what I've seen Momka's has always had whatever filtration in place that the others are now installing.

  8. #168
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    From the DIRT!
    Posts
    5,504
    Rep Power
    70

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    That's pretty cool I know I heard she was slowing down or somthing but I imagine this has her cad lineup jumping out the door .

    I see some die hards claiming they are buying Indian cads and remixing with decent results but idk
    Lampworking the road that never ends, Until your out of gas!

  9. #169
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Roanoke, VA
    Posts
    2,133
    Rep Power
    38

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    I don't know that for sure. But I've heard it from several sources and you can still get cadmiums form them, so I assume that's the case.

    Personally I never use cadmiums. I have a few pounds here that I keep thinking about selling.

  10. #170
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    260
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    Bullseye will resume glass containing chromium in early 2017.
    http://www.bullseyeglass.com/news/ba...on-update.html

    Spectrum has been sold to Oceanside Glasstile. Production of Spectrum's glass line will begin in early 2017 in Tijuana, Mexico.
    http://www.spectrumglass.com
    Information on Oceanside Glasstile: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...726-story.html

    Uroboros will cease production in early 2017. The owners hope to sell the company.
    http://us12.campaign-archive2.com/?u...a&e=20790b1374

  11. #171
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eugene
    Posts
    38,871
    Rep Power
    221

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    Thanks for the links. We were just talking about all this a few mins ago.
    ~Misha

  12. #172
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eugene
    Posts
    38,871
    Rep Power
    221

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    ~Misha

  13. #173
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    13,882
    Rep Power
    209

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    I love how it doesn't really get into what the new regulations actually are. Nothing about cadmium, just chrome?

    Any word from NS, TAG, or GA? I saw Abe's update a couple weeks back....

    I guess this is good news, right?
    Doug Harroun
    Greymatter Glass
    Albuquerque, NM
    (505) 884-0318

    A̿̐͒ͥ̏̅͋ͤͮ́́̒͢͏̨͙̩̦͔̫̠̲̤ͅ ̑ͨ̎͆͐̉̍̐ͤͮͨ͐̇ͩͦ̏ͣ̚͏̷̶̭̝̠͓̞̱̭̫͙̜̮̫͔̤̱͕͢b̓̓ͭ̿̓ͥ̐̒͂͂ͧ ̡̓͋̐ͥ҉̧̹͎̺̳̩̬̘̯̮̜̼̻͝ͅē̵̹̯̦̟͔͊̓̔͗͊̀͆͗̀ͭͭ̀̇͋͋ͩ̓̓͞͞͞ ̘̰̘͈a̧̹͙͇̫̲̻̳̦̦͛͑͂̌̊́̌̂̅ͤ̿͠ͅų̷̶̡̺̤̳͐̂ͣ̋̀ͅͅt̍̀͋̽͗̚ ̶͎͎̳̤͈̘̞͕̣̲̣̼͙͎̬̪̜͎̯ͤ̃̈́ͬͧ͒͟͞͝͡iͪ̋̌̄̎ͪ́̚҉̶̰͎̣̥͉̙̘̬͝ ͍͈̻̻f̡̟̤̥̝̞̈̋ͧͮ̂ͣͬͨ͆͊̌̇ͨ̚͠͞u̵ͥͦ̑ͧ̆͂͐̊̏̍̋̓͗ͭͫ͆́̃͊͘̕ ̛̱̳͓̠͖̕ḹ̢̧̦̬̲̟̳̉ͯͫ̊̏ͪͫ͝ͅ ̵̺̫͙̗̦̠̯̞̫̪̩͐ͭͮ̏̓͒̏͊͋̚̚͘ͅḧ̨̛̭̼̘ͤͥ̿ͫ̊ͦͧͮͮ̀̓̔͌̉̓̀̀͡ ̺͚e̷̦̤̘̯͎̜͇͚͔̱̙͖ͪ͛ͤͮͬ͆͆̾̾͂̑͆̓͜ȧ̴̋ͨ͂ͣͬ̓̆͐̾̿̐̃̒͊͌́͝ ̷͇̮̙̗͉͍r̵̜̰̣̫͙̦̻̖͕͎̘̲̗̘ͦ̋̑̀̌̎̓ͭ̚͞tͨ̅̇͛ͫͫ̆ͪ̌͋ͩ̉ͯ͊͌̌ ̴̨̢̭͚̳̦͖̻̮̬̣̮̟͓͉̪͈̍ ̷̷̫̬͈͓̞͈̞̬̹̟̯͚̹͇̩̏͋ͬ̍͛̎̑̄̽ͦ̆̔̈́̀͆ͩ̓


    .

  14. #174
    brads's Avatar
    brads is offline Intelligence has its limits. Stupidity is infinite. Higher Learning Member0-1 years in glass!1-6 years in glass!7-12 years in glass!13-18 years in glass!19-25 years in glass!25-49 years in glass!Ninja Badge
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Zombieland, Georgia
    Posts
    942
    Rep Power
    59

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    If you follow the page links you can find the regs, although they are the temporary ones. But these are also the regs that just got finalized, likely without much, if any, changes. http://www.deq.state.or.us/about/eqc...09262016-A.pdf

    I think the reason they singled out chromium is because there is a marked difference in toxicity between trivalent and hexavalent chromium, and the regulations therefore specify limits for each individually.

  15. #175
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    260
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    Bullseye distributed a status update today, which included a link to the DEQ findings which, in summary, concluded that the metals which are associated with glass production which could be attributed to Bullseye are manganese, cobalt, cadmium (see p. 3, Comparison of Phase 1 and Phase 2 analytical results), and possibly selenium (see p. 28 i.e. last page, Overall interpretation, Memorandum Appendix C). The concentrations of hexavalent chromium and lead did not appear to have any particular relationship to the Bullseye facility.

    Most results for metal analysis were near background levels, with the notable exceptions that arsenic and hexavalent chromium exceeded DEQ risk based values, but with no indication that the arsenic and chromium levels were associated with glass production.

    Bullseye statement: http://us5.campaign-archive1.com/?u=...a&e=9daf0cd004

    Link to DEQ findings: http://www.deq.state.or.us/nwr/docs/...llseyeSSR2.pdf

  16. #176
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eugene
    Posts
    38,871
    Rep Power
    221

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    thanks for the update
    ~Misha

  17. #177
    brads's Avatar
    brads is offline Intelligence has its limits. Stupidity is infinite. Higher Learning Member0-1 years in glass!1-6 years in glass!7-12 years in glass!13-18 years in glass!19-25 years in glass!25-49 years in glass!Ninja Badge
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Zombieland, Georgia
    Posts
    942
    Rep Power
    59

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    These are the statements in the study that I thought seemed most enlightening:

    Overall, a pattern is apparent that shows a strong correlation for manganese and cobalt with distance from the Bullseye facility, and cadmium shows a correlation to a lesser extent (Seidel, 2016).
    So after all the hype and handwringing, the only elevated chemical levels with a "strong correlation" to glassmaking at Bullseye are manganese and cobalt, with each (oddly, considering the "strong correlation") still near expected background levels.

    cadmium does show an apparent spatial relationship to the facility, and on average, slightly exceeds the ATSDR guideline, but not DEQ’s RBC level.
    And while area cadmium levels, which are what started this whole shitstorm in the first place, are apparently higher than normal background levels and show a correlation to Bullseye, they are still below DEQ RBC (Risk Based Concentration) levels. So it does look like Bullseye has been allowing cadmium, manganese, and cobalt to escape into the local environment. But even after 45 years they are still not in high enough concentrations to exceed DEQ limits - or warrant the mass hysteria pumped up by the press and (not surprisingly) ambulance chasing law firms.

    So yes, Bullseye needs to do - and is in the process of doing - some work to keep stray chemicals out of the environment. But were the massive hits to their reputation and financial wellbeing that were caused by this hysteria warranted? It sure doesn't look like it.

  18. #178
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Auburn, MA
    Posts
    5,880
    Rep Power
    121

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    Not to mention taking out two other manufacturers.
    Never gonna give you up, never gonna let you down. Never gonna run around, and desert you.

  19. #179
    brads's Avatar
    brads is offline Intelligence has its limits. Stupidity is infinite. Higher Learning Member0-1 years in glass!1-6 years in glass!7-12 years in glass!13-18 years in glass!19-25 years in glass!25-49 years in glass!Ninja Badge
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Zombieland, Georgia
    Posts
    942
    Rep Power
    59

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    Good point, Menty. Ironically, this might actually help Bullseye in the long run by eliminating two competitors. (Not entirely true, since Spectrum has sold their business to a firm in California that will now produce the glass, and Oroboros is trying to make a similar exit by finding a buyer.) But my guess is that Bullseye would still have preferred to avoid the headaches and financial costs of the whole episode.

  20. #180
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    260
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Bullseye pollution problems

    Apparently, Oceanside Glasstile has acquired the Uroboros name as well as the Spectrum name, and both Spectrum and Uroboros will be produced at Oceanside Glasstile's Mexican facility.

    http://us12.campaign-archive1.com/?u...6&e=20790b1374

Similar Threads

  1. Want to Trade: Who works bullseye? Looking for bullseye lampworkers, rods, frit.
    By BurntHands in forum Member's Glassifieds
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-22-2014, 10:56 PM
  2. Bullseye Fusing Frit
    By majorpowell in forum Member's Glassifieds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-04-2009, 08:40 AM
  3. Color problems, Might be clear problems
    By Ashes & Glass in forum Glass Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-31-2007, 12:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Featured Member's Spotlight!
Pogo Blackfire Glassworks Wesley Fleming Whipkey Glass Bullet Proof Glass No Coast Glass
Donate to our forum!